Virginia GOP Gets Strict on Voting
Demand for Loyalty Pledge at Primary Targets
Crossovers, Independents
By
Tim Craig and Anita Kumar
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, November 29, 2007; B01
RICHMOND, Nov. 28 -- The loyalty pledge to the
Republican Party that
Virginia voters will be required to sign if
they vote in the state's
GOP presidential primary on Feb. 12 is
another attempt by the party to police the open
primary system.
On Feb. 12, a GOP primary
voter will have to sign a piece of paper that
says, "I, the undersigned, pledge that I intend
to support the nominee of the Republican Party
for President."
Party officials said Wednesday
they are worried that Democrats and independents
have infiltrated past GOP nominating contests.
The state does not require voters to register by
political party, which means a voter can decide
on the day of the primary whether to participate
in the Republican or Democratic primary.
Political analysts say it is
rare for a partisan voter aligned with one party
to vote in the other party's nominating contest.
But some conservatives say Democrats and
independents helped
Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) win his 1996
primary against James C. Miller III. In 2000,
Arizona Sen.
John McCain (R) urged Democrats and
independents to vote for him in
Virginia's GOP presidential primary. But
McCain lost to
George W. Bush by 59,000 votes.
Charles E. Judd, executive
director of the Republican Party of Virginia,
said party officials want to make it harder for
non-Republicans to participate in the GOP
primary.
"We feel we need the right to
say to someone figuratively, 'If you intend to
support the Democrat candidate in the fall
general election, you probably shouldn't help us
pick our candidate,' " Judd said.
Del. Harvey B. Morgan
(R-Gloucester) said many Virginians want the
state to require voters to register by party
before voting in a primary. "There's a lot of
pushing for that. This is just one step in that
direction,'' he said.
The pledge, which the state
Board of Elections approved Monday, includes
instructions that say someone who refuses to
sign it "will not be permitted to vote."
But state elections officials
and other analysts said those instructions
cannot be enforced because there is no way to
keep tabs on whether someone keeps a promise to
support the GOP ticket in the November 2008
general election.
"There is no way to police
this. It's a piece of paper," said Olga
Hernandez, president of the nonpartisan
League of Women Voters in Virginia.
In 2000, Republicans asked
state election officials whether they could
require voters to sign an oath that they would
support "all of the Republican Party's nominees
in the next election." The State Board of
Elections rejected that pledge but did allow the
party to require GOP primary voters to sign a
form stating they would not also participate in
the Democrats' nominating contest, which was
held on a separate date.
Virginia law now permits
either party to request that primary voters
state their intention to support the eventual
nominee in the general election.
The prospect of turning away
voters for refusing to sign the loyalty pledge
has become fodder for Democrats, who said it's
another sign that the state GOP is out of touch
with Virginia's large bloc of independent-minded
voters.
The Democrats do not plan to ask voters to
sign a similar pledge.
"It's a slap in the face to
voters, saying, 'We don't trust you,' " said C.
Richard Cranwell, chairman of the Virginia
Democratic Party. "It's not surprising the
Republican Party doesn't trust the voters."
Judd also sought to play down
the promise that voters would be making when
they show up at the polls. He said the pledge
includes the word "intend," which he said means
some voters could change their minds during the
fall campaign and not feel as if they were
breaking their agreement with state elections
officials and the Republican Party of Virginia.
Carrie Nixon, a spokeswoman
for the nonpartisan voter advocacy group New
Electoral Reform Alliance for Virginia, said
Virginia's system of not having people register
shouldn't be changed to include loyalty oaths.
She said independent voters "would resent" being
left out of the voting process.